Cut Poison Burn is a 2010 documentary film that explores the controversial world of cancer treatment in the United States. The film is directed by Wayne Chesler and produced by Christopher Lynch. Featuring interviews with cancer patients, doctors, researchers, and activists, the film challenges the traditional approach to cancer treatment and exposes the political, financial, and ethical issues surrounding cancer research and treatment.
The film opens with the story of a young boy named Thomas Navarro, who was diagnosed with brain cancer at the age of six. Thomas's parents, Mike and Rosa Navarro, refused to accept the standard treatment for their son, which included radiation and chemotherapy. Instead, they sought out alternative treatments, such as diet, exercise, and nutritional supplements. The Navarros's struggle to find a cure for their son's cancer forms the central narrative of the film.
As the film progresses, Cut Poison Burn examines the history of cancer treatment in the United States and the current state of research and development. The film presents a critical perspective on the medical establishment, arguing that the pharmaceutical industry and the government have prioritized profit over patient care. The film also highlights the shortcomings of traditional cancer treatment, which often results in severe side effects and limited success rates.
Throughout the film, there are interviews with various experts, including cancer researchers, alternative medicine practitioners, and patient advocates. The experts offer a range of perspectives on cancer treatment, from the conventional medical model to alternative therapies such as acupuncture and herbal remedies. The film also explores the role of the media in shaping public opinion about cancer treatment and the controversial issue of cancer prevention.
One of the key issues addressed in Cut Poison Burn is the conflict between conventional cancer treatment and alternative therapies. The film argues that the medical establishment is reluctant to embrace alternative therapies because they do not fit into the established model of medical research and development. The film also raises questions about the ethics of treating cancer patients with toxic drugs and radiation, and whether patients have the right to choose alternative therapies.
In addition to the Navarro family's story, the film also follows other cancer patients and their families as they navigate the complex world of cancer treatment. These personal stories add a human element to the film and give viewers a sense of the emotional toll of cancer.
Overall, Cut Poison Burn is a thought-provoking documentary that challenges viewers to question the status quo in cancer treatment. The film presents a compelling argument for a more holistic approach to cancer treatment that takes into the whole person, including diet, lifestyle, and emotional well-being. The film encourages viewers to think critically about the role of the pharmaceutical industry and the government in cancer research and treatment and to consider alternative approaches to cancer treatment that may be more effective and less harmful than traditional methods.
Cut Poison Burn is a 2010 documentary with a runtime of 1 hour and 28 minutes. It has received mostly positive reviews from critics and viewers, who have given it an IMDb score of 8.9.